🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for our business – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

According to a recent study, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $17,000 for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements over tax credits that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. How medical professionals receive payment changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require contributions from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker earning moderate income must contribute approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute about 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you compare that with what the typical American pays. I know dozens of businesses that are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that with comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection along with supporting healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to many federal military, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding about benefits by our employees – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. And there would certainly be less liability for companies as we no longer would be privy to our employees' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, including national security to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a better and more affordable strategy for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances is that we take serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.