🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “utter hypocrisy” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media originating from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials demands proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing changes to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“As an elected official, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about business sector influence with health policies. Last month, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of corporate influence worldwide. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” stated the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“Should anti-smoking legislation fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be decreased to 30% or 50% “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, postponed for minimum twelve months after the bill passes.

The WHO actually suggests a warning should cover at least 50% of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a product container sides.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavoured tobacco products, arguing that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for various offences “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia states the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but asserts that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures operated within the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We reside in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and harvest that and market the products – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Standard business position

A BAT Zambia spokesperson commented: “The company operates its operations according with current country statutes. Additionally, the company participates in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which allow for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, adding that young individuals should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to realize planned public health goals, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, noting that BAT’s proposals “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which involves increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.